Brittany Higgins, Bruce Lehrmann rape trial to listen to of key recording of call with minister

Brittany Higgins has been grilled in court about the evening she was allegedly raped, together with inquiries about whether or not she experienced vomit stains on her costume.

The former Liberal staffer is the first witness in the legal demo of Bruce Lehrmann, who she alleges sexually assaulted her in Parliament Home soon after a boozy night out in March, 2019. Mr Lehrmann has pleaded not responsible.

On Friday morning, the fourth day of her high-profile rape demo, Ms Higgins was cross-examined by defense law firm Steven Whybrow about what she instructed the Australian Federal Law enforcement all through a conference in parliament on April 1.

‘Do you remember telling law enforcement you had absent to a healthcare centre and experienced exams finished but no results have come back again?’ Mr. Whybrow questioned.

Ms Higgins replied: ‘No. I had intention of heading to health care centers, but the minute I left do the job I was collapsing.

‘I’d been raped days prior to. I was someway building it to perform in the same workplace.

Brittany Higgins is pictured (in white) outside court docket on Friday as she arrives for working day four of her rape demo versus her previous colleague

Ms Higgins (pictured) said the phone conversation she recorded with then-employment minister Michaelia Cash was the 'weirdest' call she had ever had.

Ms Higgins (pictured) explained the cellphone discussion she recorded with then-employment minister Michaelia Money was the ‘weirdest’ phone she had at any time had.

Mr Whybrow ongoing: ‘Did you convey to cops you experienced vomit stains all down your costume?’

‘I will not recall. I was on my fingers and knees on the minister’s flooring and I vomited into the minister’s rest room,’ Ms Higgins replied.

Mr Whybrow requested Ms Higgins if she informed police that she ‘became informed of the scent of sexual intercourse?’

Ms Higgins replied: ‘Broadly accurate. I will not try to remember the specific dialogue, it was traumatising, but I believe those terms to that outcome.’

Mr Whybrow ongoing: ‘Might you have stated to law enforcement that you had vomit stains all down your gown?’

Ms Higgins responded: ‘I had fallen above in the previous venue so I had grass stains on my costume and I vomited in the minister’s rest room.’

Mr Whybrow then asked Ms Higgins when mentioned she experienced grass stains on her gown, to which she informed the court docket: ‘It has been extensively noted I experienced grass stains on my gown.’

Ms Higgins claimed she could not keep in mind no matter if she experienced vomit stains on her gown.

When asked irrespective of whether she advised law enforcement through April 1 conference that she did not want to commence with the make a difference and make a assertion, Ms Higgins mentioned: ‘I was still tossing it up. I failed to want them to action everything nonetheless. I would just experienced a really intense discussion with Ms Reynolds and my main of staff.’

Ms Higgins was referencing a conference she experienced with former protection minister Senator Linda Reynolds and her chief-of-employees Fiona Brown in the office environment in which alleges she was raped by Mr Lehrmann.

Former Liberal Party staffer Bruce Lehrmann arrives at the ACT Supreme Court in Canberra on Friday

Previous Liberal Occasion staffer Bruce Lehrmann arrives at the ACT Supreme Courtroom in Canberra on Friday

On April 9, 2019 – the day right after she instructed detectives she did not want to make a statement – she despatched a textual content to he former lover Ben Dilaway that reported: ‘I’m not interested in pursing it but it really is all past strange’.

Ms Higgins explained to the court docket: ‘I keep in mind sending it. As a lot as I trustworthy and adored Ben, he was sill a senior advisor to a cabinet minister to so I didn’t believe in that it wouldn’t get all-around. I disclosed some items to him but I did not have faith in that all my thoughts and feelings wouldn’t’ get back again to liberal HQ.’

Mr Whybrow requested: ‘Do you don’t forget deleting that information off your cell phone in advance of you gave it to police?’

Ms Higgins replied: ‘Potentially. Any image of when I was 16 and had alcoholic beverages in my hand I cleared off my telephone. Just as a place – I in no way desired to see Linda’s face all over again so I cleared images of her. I wished to scrub all the horrible components of my everyday living out. I will not keep in mind when I did it.’

Mr Whybrow place to Ms Higgins that she regularly refused to hand her telephone in excess of to police despite remaining requested on numerous occasions in 2021.

He suggested she had an appointment with law enforcement to hand her cell phone above on March 21, 2021, but she did not go to the appointment because of to an ‘urgent authorized issue… a defamation incident with Ms Reynolds,’ he told the courtroom.

‘Ah yes,’ replied Ms Higgins. ‘Lying cow. I keep in mind,’ she additional, referring to studies Senator Reynolds had referred to as her ‘a lying cow’ in February 2021.

Ms Higgins agreed that she did not hand about her phone for a variety of months, irrespective of getting asked to, but broke down on the stand when conveying why.

‘I was terrified on the foundation that, [on the week of May 21] I discovered out that the minute I reengaged with police that any politically delicate issues that are within just the remit of law enforcement will get described to the Household Affairs minister,’ she explained to the court

Brittany Higgins told the court she secretly recorded a conversation with then-employment minister Michaelia Cash (pictured) in 2021

Brittany Higgins informed the courtroom she secretly recorded a discussion with then-employment minister Michaelia Money (pictured) in 2021

Ms Higgins said former house affairs minister Peter Dutton had facts about her prior to she built her official police statement.

‘I was quite fearful,’ she instructed the court.

‘I was looking for legal information to know my rights mainly because I was terrified.’

On Thursday, the courtroom heard Ms Higgins secretly recorded a cell phone dialogue with her previous manager and then-work minister Michaelia Dollars in 2021, which she described as ‘the weirdest phone of my life’.

Ms Higgins at first labored for Senator Reynolds, but took a job as a junior media advisor with Senator Income following the 2019 election.

Ms Higgins, now 27, instructed the court underneath cross-examination that the senator was pretending she didn’t know about the alleged rape all through the cellular phone connect with – regardless of having spoken about it beforehand.

‘It was preposterous. It was the weirdest phone get in touch with I have ever had in my existence,’ she reported.

Mr Whybrow put to Ms Higgins on Thursday that she experienced sent the recording to many persons, which includes journalists, to commence backgrounding for the tale.

But Ms Higgins reported it was for her legal security, so she could corroborate her story.

‘I was hoping to give [the recording] to as several men and women as possible to have them just so that they existed,’ she stated.

‘It’s my phrase against a cabinet minister’s, and the power disparity involving people two is preposterous.’

Ms Higgins also recorded a conversation with Senator Cash’s previous main of employees Daniel Check out without the need of his know-how and sent it to journalist Samantha Maiden, but said it should really not be printed.

All through that dialogue, Ms Higgins instructed the courtroom the main of workers referred to yet another sexual assault in just the Liberals that was under no circumstances claimed.

The court also heard Ms Higgins recorded the discussions after a 6-hour interview with Lisa Wilkinson for The Project on February 2, 2021.

Brittany Higgins sent texts about the alleged rape to former lover Ben Dillaway (pictured)

Brittany Higgins despatched texts about the alleged rape to previous lover Ben Dillaway (pictured)

She reported Ms Wilkinson and Ms Maiden had been ‘fighting’ over when her tale would be released.

‘Who bought the exclusive drop so that appear Walkley’s time, who could claim what and so it turned not even about me or my tale,’ she told the court.

Ms Maiden received the Gold Walkley in 2021 – Australian journalism’s maximum honor, even though Ms Wilkinson was awarded a Logie this year.

Ms Higgins explained Ms Wilkinson was ‘quite angry’ about the timing of his job interview on The Challenge.

Mr Whybrow place to her that she did the interview to hurt the Liberal get together ideal right before an election, but Ms Higgins stated she simply wished to chat about a ‘cultural problem’ in Parliament.

‘I believed I might do a person print and one Tv set and then I would go back again to uni and disappear,’ she defined.

Ms Higgins informed the courtroom The Undertaking host was ‘quite angry’ when the job interview was aired on February 15 since it was a Monday, and Ms Wilkinson did not commonly perform on Mondays.

Right after both of those stories dropped, Ms Higgins reported she was inundated with media requests.

The courtroom read she geared up a timeline of events to give to police and, when she was ‘passed out on Valium’ owing to the stress of the media whirlwind, her partner David Sharaz made the final decision to give the timeline to two journalists.

Brittany Higgins recorded an interview with Lisa Wilkinson (pictured) for The Project in January 2021

Brittany Higgins recorded an interview with Lisa Wilkinson (pictured) for The Venture in January 2021

Lisa Wilkinson (left) interviewed Brittany Higgins (right) on The Project in 2019 about her rape

Lisa Wilkinson (remaining) interviewed Brittany Higgins (right) on The Project in 2019 about her rape

Nonetheless, she claims the timeline ended up in the hands of ‘the total push gallery’, and that Mr Sharaz regrets his selection.

Mr Whybrow also quizzed her over a series of inconsistencies in her authentic testimony, together with what she did with the white cocktail dress she wore on the night of the alleged assault.

Ms Higgins to begin with instructed the court docket she put it in a bag beneath her bed for six months just before she ‘symbolically washed it’ and wore it when much more.

Having said that, under cross-examination it was unveiled the dress was only beneath her mattress for a subject of weeks.

Mr Whybrow offered Ms Higgins with a picture of her in the costume at Ms Reynolds’ birthday celebration in Perth in April 2019 – considerably less than two months after the alleged rape.

Ms Higgins conceded to the court docket that she ‘was wrong’, but managed the costume was beneath her bed ‘for a time period of time’.

The demo proceeds.

- Advertisement -

Comments are closed.