Congress Chief Controversial Statements That Designed Enormous Controversy And Direct Party Into Difficulties

Congress Leader Controversial Statements: Right after the controversial statement offered by Congress chief Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury about the President, the Congress has got a large amount of hassle. The Congress leader has apologized to President Draupadi Murmu for his statement. Really Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury had utilized the word Rashtrapati for the President. Following which the BJP made a whole lot of ruckus in the two the houses of Parliament relating to this issue. However, this is not the very first time that Congress leaders have offered an situation to the BJP though sitting down. Even before this a lot of periods the statements of Congress leaders have introduced shame to the bash. We are heading to convey to you about some this kind of statements of Congress leaders not too long ago.

The most talked about statements of Congress leaders have been those people of senior chief Mani Shankar Aiyar. He had named Narendra Modi a chaiwala throughout the 2014 Lok Sabha elections and ridiculed his ambition to grow to be the primary minister. He had reported that Modi can distribute tea in Congress conferences, but cannot grow to be the Primary Minister. A location will be discovered for the Chief Minister of Gujarat to distribute tea.

Mani Shankar Aiyar’s controversial statement

Aiyar’s well known ‘chaiwala’ remark against PM Modi is thought to have helped the BJP acquire a major victory in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections. Mani Shankar Aiyar had also created a controversial statement about Key Minister Narendra Modi in the course of the 2017 Gujarat election campaign and known as him ‘neech insaan’. For this, Congress experienced suspended senior chief Mani Shankar Aiyar. BJP also won the Gujarat assembly elections. A few months later on, Iyer’s suspension was revoked.

Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury has performed it previously also

Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury has been building complications for the bash even right before this owing to his statements. He designed a controversial statement on the removal of Report 370 from Jammu and Kashmir. The government then, when responding to the responses received from other nations, mentioned that this is an inner subject of India. On this, Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury had stated how can this be an inside subject when the United Nations is monitoring it considering that 1948.

Manish Tewari raised issues on his individual party’s government

Prior to the elections in 5 states including UP, Congress chief Manish Tewari experienced designed some this sort of revelations in his e-book which had set the Congress in the dock. Manish Tewari wrote in his guide that India ought to have taken action against Pakistan after 26/11. The Congress-led UPA was in electricity at that time. He wrote that when hundreds of harmless folks have been brutally murdered, restraint is not a signal of energy. It is considered a symbol of weak spot. 26/11 was a time when action should really have been taken.

Sonia Gandhi and Salman Khurshid have also supplied controversial statements

Earlier, through the Gujarat Assembly election marketing campaign of 2007, Congress President Sonia Gandhi named Narendra Modi a ‘Saudagar of death’, and the occasion experienced endured a good deal. Salman Khurshid’s identify is also in this checklist. Senior Congress leader Salman Khurshid, in his reserve ‘Sunrise About Ayodhya: Nationhood in Our Times’, in contrast Hindutva to radical jihadi groups like ISIS and Boko Haram. The controversy around Khurshid’s e-book came a number of months just before the UP assembly elections. This challenge was elevated extensively by BJP and in these elections also BJP won.

Several other leaders have given such statements

Congress chief Jairam Ramesh has also been in dialogue about his statements. He reported in 2012 that, “There are extra temples in the nation than bogs.” Lots of right-wing businesses together with Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and Bajrang Dal experienced strongly opposed this make any difference. At the exact time, in 2019, BJP surrounded the Congress above Sam Pitroda’s ‘hua to hua’ remark. On the 1984 anti-Sikh riots, Sam Pitroda had explained that ‘hua to hua’. Congress experienced to facial area opposition right after this remark.

The Congress then distanced itself from Pitroda’s assertion. Pitroda later on apologized for his assertion and blamed his inadequate Hindi for it. Pitroda had explained, “The statement I manufactured was wholly distorted, as my Hindi is not great, I meant ‘jo hua wo poor hua’, I was ‘bad’ in my mind. Could not translate.

Congress MLA’s assertion developed complications

Recently, all through the interrogation of Sonia Gandhi by the ED, Congress MLA from Karnataka KR Ramesh Kumar also explained this kind of a matter about which the celebration all over again bought scolded. He reported that in the identify of Nehru, Indira and Sonia Gandhi, we built a great deal of cash for our three to four generations. It will not be great if we cannot sacrifice even this much for Congress and Sonia Gandhi. Having said that, this is not the 1st time that a Congress MLA has created a controversial assertion. Even right before this, KR Ramesh Kumar has been in the discussion about his statements. He experienced explained in December 2021 that if you simply cannot quit the rape, then lie down and have pleasurable. After this statement, there was a whole lot of difficulties for the Congress.

read this also-

Rashtrapatni Remark: Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury wrote a letter to President Draupadi Murmu apologizing, stating- ‘the tongue experienced slipped’

Bhagat Singh Koshyari Remark: Now the MLAs of Shinde faction explained – the assertion would have been presented to the governor in writing, CM will communicate

- Advertisement -

Comments are closed.