Queer Eye stars’ small business launch prompts queerbaiting debate

Queer Eye stars Antoni Porowski and Jonathan Van Ness pretended to be relationship. (Twitter/ Antoni)

Queer Eye stars Jonathan Van Ness and Antoni Porowski have sparked a queerbaiting debate soon after pretending to day to offer dog treats.

On Wednesday (14 September), Van Ness and Porowski shared a sequence of social media posts, with pictures of them keeping fingers and staring into just about every other’s eyes.

In one, Van Ness wrote: “We’re lastly jointly. Information tomorrow, but know that we’re really pleased and emotion supported by the people today all-around us.”

Porowski added in a further: “Some particular news. After decades of joking about it, we are eventually alongside one another. This is to offering matters a shot. Extra tomorrow.”

A working day later, they both of those posted again, with Van Ness tweeting: “Whoops, important clarification – we’re collectively in *small business* BAYBIEZ!

“Introducing Yummers meal mix-ins for pets!! I’m SO psyched for you all to meet up with the unbelievable, sustainable, and deLISH (talk to Larry) pet corporation that Antoniand I co-launched!”

But the stunt failed to go very as prepared, sparking a fierce debate in excess of irrespective of whether the Queer Eye stars had been queerbaiting.

Just one Twitter user instructed Van Ness they ended up “literally queerbaiting to sell s**t to your mainly cis straight viewers that you cater to”, and a Slate The post explained the joke as “shameless, manipulative, and deeply moronic”, although also misgendering Van Ness.

But numerous admirers jumped to the pair’s protection, perplexed about how they could be queerbaiting when they are both equally associates of the LGBTQ+ community, with one particular asking: “They’re actually two openly queer folks. Who are still queer now. How’s that queerbaiting??”

“Why the f**k are folks so mad at JVN and Antoni for generating a silly joke and selling their puppy deal with manufacturer,” questioned an additional.

“If you do not feel it can be that amusing then will not interact, they’re not some evil capitalists manipulating you with queerbaiting. Virtually just mates possessing a giggle.”

Van Ness addressed the allegations himself, tweeting: “Seeing folx be mad about two queer men and women generating a joke to start a biz are the very same critics who have very little to say about queer issues impacting queer men and women.

“Don’t say trans payments, the overturning of Dobbs, the menace to marriage equality… but certainly be mad about pet foods.”

“Some v indignant folx declaring I don’t do just about anything for our neighborhood and so on,” he additional.

“I basically advocate queer issues seem at the system of my function and you would see the work.

“But it can be not even about me! It is about individuals painting you in regardless of what s****y gentle fits their narrative and I’m not here for it.”

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

Comments are closed.