US remark comparing PM Modi with Saudi PM Mohammed bin Salman was pointless, suggests India


President Joe Biden, appropriate, shakes arms with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. File. , Image Credit rating: Reuters

Criticizing the US Point out Department’s comparison of immunity specified to Key Minister Narendra Modi due to the fact 2014 with the authorized immunity now specified to Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman, the authorities on Thursday claimed the US comments had been not “appropriate, required or contextual” .

The Ministry of External Affairs also took intention at the US Commission on Worldwide Spiritual Liberty (USCIRF) for issuing a “Place Update” that accused the governing administration of “partaking in or tolerating systematic, ongoing, and egregious spiritual flexibility violations”.

Speaking about a report that stated Mr. Modi had hoped to journey to the US for a Point out Stop by in December this 12 months, the MEA spokesperson mentioned the authorities experienced created no this kind of proposal. He also reported that Mr. Modi and US President Joe Biden experienced met on a “range of events” throughout the the latest G20 summit in Bali, like a “quick bilateral meeting” and a trilateral assembly with Indonesian President Joko Widodo.

“We have seen the biased and inaccurate observations about India by the USCIRF. Their tendency to constantly misrepresent details reveals a absence of knowing of India, its constitutional framework, plurality and robust democratic program,” stated MEA spokesperson Arindam Bagchi, when questioned about the update issued by the Congressional human body that experienced presently issued an annual report and other documents expressing worry over human legal rights and religious freedom in India earlier this yr.

The “Country Update”, launched on November 22, experienced provided recent incidents and govt actions that it referred to as a “crackdown on civil society and dissent”, pointing to the imprisonment and harassment of “journalists, legal professionals, legal rights activists, teachers, political leaders, spiritual minorities, and other folks crucial of its insurance policies “. It also mentioned that the government’s steps have “eroded the secular rules of the Indian Structure and India’s pluralistic democracy by advertising and applying its Hindutva ideology as a result of authorities coverage”, and recommended that the US Condition Division, which periodically releases a list of nations getting viewed for religious independence issues, to designate India as a Country of Specific Issue (CPC).

The MEA spokesperson reported the federal government experienced not protested about the USCIRF report with the US Embassy or government, as the USCIRF is a US Congressional body, not a governing administration 1. In 2005, Mr. Modi, the then Gujarat Chief Minister experienced been place on a US visa ban beneath the 1998 US International Spiritual Independence Act (IRFA), after a suggestion from the USCIRF that had criticized his purpose in the 2002 Gujarat riots.

Mr. Bagchi also expressed surprise at a modern comment by US Condition Department spokesperson Vedant Patel on November 18 on the concern of the US visa ban. Mr. Patel had stated, in reaction to a number of concerns from the US push corps above the Biden administration’s conclusion to give Saudi Prince Mohammed immunity in the Jamal Khashoggi murder circumstance, provided his new job as head of the Saudi federal government, that the US has specified similiar immunity to Mr. Modi and a selection of other leaders like former Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe, previous Congolese President Laurent Kabila and previous Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide. “I fail to fully grasp how [the State Department’s] The remark on PM Modi was both needed, relevant or contextual. Our two nations take pleasure in a extremely distinctive connection that is heading from power to toughness, and we search ahead to deepening it,” he stated.

- Advertisement -

Comments are closed.